We Are At War

Czech president finally admits he cannot block the Lisbon Treaty... and gives David Cameron's Tories a problem | Mail Online

Not surprisingly, Vaclav Klaus has given in to the bullies in Brussels.

As I showed in an earlier post, the colleagues were determined to implement the Lisbon constitution irrespective of any opposition.

I don't believe Cameron has the guts or the intelligence to challenge any of this by giving us a referendum (and then acting on the result).

We (the people) are consequently at war not just with our own government but also with the EU.

What is the next step?

Czech Spanner In EU Lisbon Works

EU Lisbon Treaty: Czech Republic government caves in to eurosceptic president - Telegraph

The crisis over the EU Lisbon Treaty has deepened after the Czech Republic's government backed down in a battle with President Vaclav Klaus over his refusal to sign the text.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA! Long may it continue.

Why Renegotiating Lisbon Is A Possibility For the UK

All politicians are full of cockwaffle, which means that they'll change what they actually do if they think it'll save their skins or make their lives easier.

Pondering on the juggernautish inevitability of the Lisbon Constitution being ratified by all subservient 'partenaires' of the great European Project (the fart-arsing of the Czechs notwithstanding) it struck me that Cameron and his crew could indeed hold a referendum on the whole or parts of said 'Treaty', and thus demand substantial changes with regard to the UK (not as good as outright withdrawal, of course) without necessarily alienating all our 'allies' across the Channel.

I base this idea upon three factors: the first being that the EU wants our money as much as it wants our subservience. Six billion quid a year may be a small part of their bloodsucker's budget but six billion is still six billion. If pushed to the wall then Cameron could simply say "fuck you, chaps, no cash from us unless we get what we want". Yes, I know I am being naive, but in the end this is a matter of plain power politics. The French and Italian governments are continuously fucking around with money and the EU and getting away with it.

Our politicians have continuously proved to lack nous or balls when confronted with the despots of the EU (even Thatcher caved in) but the bureaucrats in Brussels are so desperate to get this thing in place they might just go along with concessions for the UK as long as they can subjugate the rest.

The second factor is that, as we have seen from the words of the Grand Constitutional Architect himself, M Valery Giscard d'Estaing (see previous posts) the Franco-German pact is the EU. As long this holds, no one else matters. And, certainly as far The Grand Architect and his friends are concerned, the UK is not a player, merely an insignificant occasional irritant. In other words, they don't give a fuck about us.

Thirdly, Berlusconi and others have already been talking about developing a two-tier EU if the Lisbon Constitution does not receive full acceptance (see earlier posts).

Put that together and you have a scenario in which the UK government could go the people in a referendum and then ask (nay, demand) either de-ratification of the Treaty with regard to the UK or substantial renegotiation. The EU may get sick of the delays and aggravation and just say yes, after all.

The EU are bullies and liars. They're not used to national politicians standing up to them, particularly from the UK. It's about time they got a dose of their own medicine. Our liberty and freedom to govern ourselves are at stake.

It is, of course, not likely to happen.

The question really is, what are we, as British citizens, going to do to resist and subvert the EU Project within our shores?

The EU's Irish Nemesis

EU Referendum finds a 'large measure of comfort' in the prospect of an Irish 'yes' vote on the Lisbon Treaty. Because it would spell the beginning of the end for the whole dishonest enterprise.

It's certainly true that the EU has managed to be as successful as it is by virtue of its invisibility. Just think: all those people in Ireland voting on something they don't understand about a treaty they've never read, produced by an institution whose operations they never see. Once the EU makes itself visible - and all its corrupt, undemocratic ways - the clearer it becomes to everyone what's going on.

It may indeed turn out to be the overweening vanity and arrogance of the EU's politicians that kick starts the collapse. The sooner the better.

Klaus Correct To Veto Lisbon Constitution

The liars in the EU and their supporters continue to pretend that the Lisbon 'Treaty' is not the same as the rejected European Consitution and with the same intentions, ie to create an EU superstate, but some leaders have the courage to acknowledge the truth.

Czech president Vaclav Klaus has said he will not ratify the Lisbon Constitution.

"The Lisbon Treaty is dead for this moment," said President Klaus. "It is dead because it was rejected in a referendum in one member state. Therefore, a decision on ratification of this treaty is not on the agenda at this point."

Ireland plans to hold a new vote later this year on the EU's charter for reform. Yesterday the Czech senate voted 54-20 to ratify the treaty which is meant to simplify decision-making in a union that has grown from 15 to 27 members over the past five years. Mr Klaus and lawmakers among the ruling right-wing Civic Democrats claim that the treaty takes away sovereignty and is a step towards a European superstate.

There's a fuller treatment on the BBC site, with a telling comment from Klaus:

"Our politicians have always found similar cowardly explanations: We are too small, too weak, we do not mean anything in the European context, we must fall into line, although we disagree with it," he said.

"I reject this. Either we regained sovereignty after the 1989 overthrow of the communist regime... or this was nothing but a tragic error," he continued.

The Treaty/Constitution does indeed pave the way for the EU as a federal superstate which takes away national sovereignty (that sovereignty which it hasn't already taken away, that is) and should be destroyed.